For the second year in a row, Samsung Electronics received
top ranking. According to Gartner, it
first achieved its first place ranking in 2012 because of its smartphone and
global mobile phone sales. The same holds true for 2013. The company’s supply
chain is a combination of outsourcing and in-house production – a major
difference from its main competitor, Apple which relies entirely on contract
manufacturers. Samsung has indicated its
approach as a competitive advantage for the company. According to a Samsung
spokesperson "Manufacturing is the backbone of Samsung's growth and we put
very much emphasis on improving manufacturing competitiveness,”. The
spokesperson also noted "Samsung manufactures more than 90% of our
products internally and only relies on contractors for peripheral products such
as components, feature phones and handset cases." As a result, Samsung believes this approach
allows it to adapt quickly to changing market conditions.
Indeed, Apple’s supply chain may incur greater risk than
that of Samsung’s model. For example, in 2012 with the launch of its iMac and
iPad mini, suppliers were not prepared for the high demand and as a result, a
shortage of supplies occurred and shipments were constrained. The aftermath of
the 2011 Japanese earthquake also caused disruptions and supply shortages in
Apple Inc.’s iPad 2, which depended on several components manufactured in
Japan—including a hard-to-replace electronic compass, the battery and possibly
the advanced technology glass in the display
On the other hand, by keeping the majority of production
in-house, costs may be higher for Samsung. Still, industry analysts cite
Samsung’s vertical integration as a competitive advantage for the company. It designs and manufactures four of the most
valuable components in handsets: application processors, DRAM, NAND flash and
displays – which together constitute about two-thirds of a phone’s bill of
materials.
While Samsung retains the top spot for the second year in a
row, other companies are moving quickly up Gartner’s list. Haier entered the top ten for the first time
at number 3 while Lenovo moved up two places to the second spot. With almost
half of its revenue deriving from Asia-Pacific along with its “hybrid supply
chain” model, it will be interesting to see if Lenovo or even Haier surpasses
Samsung next year.